In response to siren issue

Dear Editor,

I would like to respond to Mr. Hafer's letter to the editor and also to two of the supervisors' comments.

Yes, I agree with Mr. Hafer that the siren was mandated by our government for catastrophes, not for fire calls or accidents. I have lived in Rush Township for 28 years, and of that 28 years I had been a volunteer for 24 of those years, along with my wife.

Before condemning me, Mr. Hafer, can I ask how many years have you given to the community of Rush Township? We volunteered for most of the functions the fire company would have while we were active. I have no problem with the siren during the day or early evening, but I can't see it being sounded at all hours of the morning when it isn't for civil defense.

As for Jeannine Motroni saying I was asked to resign, that isn't the whole story. I was told I could resign or they would appoint an investigation committee, and if they found me to be wrong then I would be thrown out of the fire company. It was a one-way ticket. I didn't fit in with "the clique" because I tell it like it is and don't bow down to anyone. If I would have had a hearing and a fair one, I would still be serving the people of Rush Township.

Supervisor Robert Libensperger said the supervisors have nothing to do with the fire company. Mr. Libensperger said they only donate monies to the fire company. If this is the case, then why does the township supply workmen's compensation for the firemen and fire police, and why do the fire company and fire police take orders directly from Rush Township police?

This is the only letter I will respond to, because I can't believe the mentality of the people I am dealing with.

Sincerely,

Joseph E. Shamonsky