Trump tried to seize control of Mueller probe, report says
WASHINGTON (AP) — Public at last, special counsel Robert Mueller’s report revealed to a waiting nation Thursday that President Donald Trump tried to seize control of the Russia probe and force Mueller’s removal to stop him from investigating potential obstruction of justice by the president.
Mueller laid out multiple episodes in which Trump directed people around him to try to influence or curtail the Russia investigation after the special counsel’s appointment in May 2017. Those efforts “were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests,” Mueller wrote.
After nearly two years, the two-volume, 448-page redacted report made for riveting reading.
In one particularly dramatic moment, Mueller reported that Trump was so agitated at the special counsel’s appointment on May 17, 2017, that he slumped back in his chair and declared: “Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my presidency. I’m f---ed.”
In June of that year, Mueller wrote, Trump directed White House Counsel Don McGahn to call Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversaw the probe, and say that Mueller must be ousted because he had conflicts of interest. McGahn refused — deciding he would rather resign than trigger a potential crisis akin to the Saturday Night Massacre of Watergate firings fame.
Two days later, the president made another attempt to alter the course of the investigation, meeting with former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski and dictating a message for him to relay to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The message: Sessions would publicly call the investigation “very unfair” to the president and say that Mueller should limit his probe to “investigating election meddling for future elections.” Sessions didn’t do so.
Flash forward to Thursday, and Trump celebrated the report’s release, telling the audience at an unrelated White House event that he was having “a good day, too. It was called no collusion, no obstruction.” He also renewed his calls for an investigation into the origins of the inquiry, saying, “We do have to get to the bottom of these things, I will say.”
The Justice Department posted a redacted version of the report online, 90 minutes after Attorney General William Barr offered his own final assessment of the findings.
The release represented a moment of closure nearly two years in the making and at the same time the starting bell for a new round of partisan warfare.
Democrats cried foul as Barr held a press conference just before the release — “spinning the report” in the words of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. They sent up a chorus of calls for Mueller himself to testify before Congress, and Barr said he wouldn’t object.
Moments after Barr finished speaking, House Judiciary Chairman Nadler sent a letter requesting that Mueller himself testify before his panel “no later than May 23.”
Mueller evaluated 10 episodes for possible obstruction of justice, and said he could not conclusively determine that Trump had committed criminal obstruction. The episodes included Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey, the president’s directive to subordinates to have Mueller fired and efforts to encourage witnesses not to cooperate.
The president’s lawyers have said Trump’s conduct fell within his constitutional powers, but Mueller’s team deemed the episodes deserving of criminal scrutiny.
As for the question of whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign, Mueller wrote, “While the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges.”
Mueller also said there wasn’t sufficient evidence to charge any campaign official with working as an unregistered foreign agent of Russia.
The report included an appendix that contained 12 pages of Trump’s written responses to the special counsel. They included no questions about obstruction of justice, as was part of an agreement with Trump’s legal team.
Trump told Mueller he had “no recollection” of learning in advance about the much-scrutinized Trump Tower meeting between campaign officials and a Russian lawyer. He also said he had no recollection of knowledge about emails setting up the meeting that promised dirt on Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
He broadly denied knowing of any foreign government trying to help his campaign, including the Russian government. He said he was aware of some reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin had made “complimentary statements” about him.
Trump said that his comment during a 2016 political rally asking Russian hackers to help find emails scrubbed from Clinton’s private server was made “in jest and sarcastically” and that he did not recall being told during the campaign of any Russian effort to infiltrate or hack computer systems.
Mueller’s team wrote that Trump’s answers were “inadequate.” They considered issuing a subpoena for Trump, but decided against it after weighing the likelihood of a long legal battle.
Comments
How could they determine that Trump had committed criminal obstruction, when there is, or was no crime committed!
If there was No Crime, how could "Trump Obstruct"
The writer of this AP dirt bomb, was a confidant to the Clinton's for many years. In these times of "Fake News" it is very important to first read the By-Line. By the way, much of what gets to print in this rag (TN) is Fake News. It just so happens to be local, so I read it too.
Email: Urgentspellcast@gmail.com or Urgentspellcast@yahoo.com
Website: https://urgentspellcast.wordpress.com
WhatsApp: +14243308109
Trump knew what he was up against. Mueller's team was comprised of a bunch of Obama lawyers, a bunch of Hillary lawyers who’ve also been fundraisers, bundlers, big time donors. Trump knew there were no parameters on Mueller's investigation. There were no limits put on where he could go, what he could do. He was gonna find a crime if it’s a process crime. He was looking into Trump’s business procedures and practices already in 2008. There’s no stopping the guy. It’s out of control and it needs to be brought under control big time, and Trump knew that. What did you expect him to say? But he survived, and now perhaps the truth will come out. Just sit back and watch.
Do you remember Mueller put four people in prison for years in the Whitey Bulger investigation — mob boss, crime boss in Boston — and the four turned out to be entirely innocent, and they were released. They were entirely innocent. Mueller put four people in jail. The four innocent men were in prison for more than 30 years. Trump knew the kind of man Mueller is, yet Trump survived.
Joe... get this...
Two of the men Mueller put in prison, died before they were freed and exonerated. But get this. It was discovered the FBI withheld evidence from the court of their innocence in order to protect their informant. The men would have been cleared but Mueller and the prosecutors withheld evidence from the court to protect their CI [confidential informant]. Thirty years in jail, four innocent people, from the man of impeccable integrity inside the establishment swamp.
You are on the wrong side of history on this one Joe.
Wake up... smell the coffee. It's over!
Books:
The Russian Hoax, Greg Jarret-great sources
Spygate, Dan Bongino-great sources
Podcasts:
Sean Hannity
Dan Bongino episode #946
Bill O’Reilly
Buck Sexton
Glenn Beck
Radio:
Rush Limbaugh
Sean Hannity
Dan Bongino
Buck Sexton
Glenn Beck
Mark Belling
TV:
Sean Hannity
Tucker Carlson
Laura Ingraham
Mark Levine
Jennie Pirro (sp)
This is off the top of my head. There are more. The books are both well sourced with footnotes. The podcasts are titled by subject matters. Go to iHeartRadio for that. All this is available. The TV programs can be reviewed from YouTube (highlights). Don’t be a lock minded hater.
Rush Limbaugh is a radio commentator. The Mueller Report should be unbiased. The lawyers involved are all left wingers. Mueller is biased against Trump because he wanted the Director of the FBI position and was seemingly shunned. Also, Mueller and Trump had a failed business deal. The job of a jury or a report is to state either guilty or innocent. That is all. Bias was indicated by a two year investigation with a whole team that hated the subject of investigation. They railroaded Flynn, Manafort, and others by intimidation and threats. Should the SWAT team invade a house early in the morning to arrest for tax evasion? What if that was you? That is ok, right? Oh, you didn’t know about that...so, it is alright. Come on Joe. This investigation was a fraud. The people that wasted your money doing it were frauds. The Mueller Report is a fraud. It is all laid out there for anyone to see...if you care about truth and honor and justice. If you refuse the accurate and proven sources put into your lap then you make yourself into a fraud too. It is too bad for you. Half an education is as good as no education at all.
I know most the team's credentials, if not, I wouldn't take the stand I do.
Big Dog Andrew Weissmann, was deputy and later director of the Enron Task Force. Weissmann destroyed an accounting firm (Arthur Andersen LLP). All 85,000 jobs worldwide were also destroyed— only to be reversed several years later by a unanimous Supreme Court.
I also learned that Weissmann was a Barack Obama and Democratic campaign donor.
CNN reported that “three members of the legal team known to have been hired so far by special counsel Robert Mueller to handle the Russia investigation have given political donations almost exclusively to Democrats,” naming Jeannie Rhee, James Quarles, and Andrew Weissmann. CNN of all people! They were gloating Ha Ha Ha Ha that's the way FAKE NEWS is.
Look my friend, I haven't the time or energy to get you up to speed. Wake up, do your own homework. Perhaps we can sit and discuss over a coffee.
I prefer discussing the events surrounding Jesus though.
Peace, and Happy Easter
He has risen!
A biased mob couldn't find anything that would stick. Ha Ha Ha
That grinds your gears more than Hillary loosing an election that was rigged in her favor.
Let's face it Joe, the Democrats are looking pretty slippery right about now.
Nit pick with someone else, you are like the grandkids. tiring!
Gee that was easy.
After 3 Years in a relationship with my Boyfriend, my Boyfriend started going out with other girls and showing me cold love, on several occasions he threatens to broke-up with me if I dare question him about his affair with other girls, I was totally devastated and confused until an old friend of mine told me about a spell caster on the internet DR LARRY who help people with their relationship and marriage problem by the powers of love Spells, At first I doubted If such thing ever exists but decided to give it a try, When I contact him, he told me everything I needed to do and I did and he helped me cast a Love Spell and within 28Hours my boyfriend came back to me and started apologizing, now he has stopped going out with girls and he is with me for good and for real. Contact this Great spell Caster for your relationship or marriage problem.
Here's his contact.. Website: http://assurancesolutionhome.wordpress.com http://assurancesolutionhome.website2.me/
CALL/WHATSAPP: +2348102316854 EMAIL: assurancesolutionhome@gmail.com
Email: Urgentspellcast@gmail.com or Urgentspellcast@yahoo.com
Website: https://urgentspellcast.wordpress.com
WhatsApp: +14243308109
The Australian Diplomat was drunk at a bar. Do you want to investigate every barroom discussion? Come on Joe. The Russian Hoax...Gregg Jarrett. Half knowledge = no knowledge
Pagination