Baker, Yudichak offer differing opinions on recreational pot bill

(AP) — Could legal pot be coming to Pennsylvania?

Two state senators from Southeastern Pennsylvania introduced a bill this week to legalize recreational marijuana.

Following the announcement, state Sens. John Yudichak and Lisa Baker offered differing opinions on the proposal.

Yudichak, D-14, Carbon/Luzerne, seemed willing to listen, but not committed to the idea; while Baker, R-20, Luzerne, reiterated her opposition of legalized marijuana.

Under a proposal by Democratic state Sens. Daylin Leach and Sharif Street, recreational use of marijuana would be legal for anyone 21 years old and older. Growing up to six pot plants in your home would be allowed. Regulated pot-smoking lounges would be legal.

All criminal convictions for marijuana possession or for selling a small amount would be automatically expunged.

Leach and Street are seeking co-sponsors for their bill, which is being introduced less than two years since medical marijuana became legal in the state.

Asked for comment on the proposal, staffers for both Yudichak and Baker responded by sending statements similar to ones they’ve previously delivered to the media.

“As a supporter of the successful medical marijuana program in Pennsylvania, I am open to the conversation regarding the full decriminalization of marijuana,” Yudichak said in a statement. “The conversation should not, however, be driven simply by those who are eager for new tax revenue, but by our ability to legalize marijuana in a safe and responsible manner.”

The senators pushing the bill say a majority of tax revenue generated would fund the public education system.

A statement from Baker said she is opposed to the plan.

“Pennsylvania is still in the early stages of implementing medical marijuana, which at least is taking place in a restrictive and controlled environment. Without the benefit of additional research, I do not support legalizing recreational marijuana,” Baker said. “The prospect of realizing additional revenue is insufficient reason to set aside the public health concerns.”

Baker said the state is already trying to grapple with a crisis due to opioid drugs.

“The marijuana debate should not occur outside of the context of the severe opioid crisis being confronted across our communities,” Baker said. “There is also a significant public safety concern, as recent reports disclosed the frustration within the law enforcement community over the difficulty of finding a reliable test for determining driving under the influence of drugs.”