Skip to main content

Court: Stern to remain as school director

Published December 13. 2018 12:34PM

By Jarrad Hedes

jmhedes@tnonline.com

Carbon County President Judge Roger Nanovic awarded partial judgment Monday in favor of Lehighton Area School District’s board president as part of a lawsuit alleging a Sunshine Act violation last December.

Nanovic ruled Monday he would not remove Larry Stern from office, as requested by Lehighton school board director David Bradley, and residents Frances Flickinger and Janice Bowman.

The trio allege Stern called for an official vote on a nonagenda item on Dec. 4, 2017, “without calling on Bowman or Flickinger, who had their hands raised.”

They also allege Stern refused to allow public comment at a Dec. 21 meeting.

“Neither the provisions of the Sunshine Act nor Section 5301 of the Crimes Code provide for removal as a sanction for a violation,” Nanovic wrote in his ruling Monday.

Stern denied being aware Bowman and Flickinger sought to comment on the motion in question, a vote on filling a board vacancy that eventually deadlocked 4-4.

Nanovic left the door open for the trio to pursue further action on the Sunshine Act violation allegation, though it would not be in the civil court arena.

Instead, Nanovic said, that would be a matter to go before a magisterial district judge.

“A violation of the Sunshine Act is a criminal summary offense,” Nanovic wrote in his court order. “To initiate summary criminal proceedings other than by a law enforcement officer, a private criminal complaint must be filed with magisterial district judge.”

Bradley, Bowman and Flickinger’s filing also alleges Stern violated an oath under the school code he took when elected to the position.

A violation of the Sunshine Act, Nanovic wrote, would not necessarily constitute a violation of that oath.

Lehighton Area School District was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

Nanovic granted a motion to dismiss the district as a party to the proceedings.

Comments
Is it wrong to ask our Government to follow the law? To ask them to act in a honest and ethical manner, to use integrity in making decisions when representing us? There is a reason we have a Sunshine Law and an Office of Open Records. These laws are in place to protect the community, the people, the constituents. If transparency is provided, if the law is followed, if our elected government and their employees act in an honest, open and ethical manner there is no need to use these measures. It is not just happening here in Lehighton either. These things occur in many of the school districts and municipalities across Pennsylvania.
I don't believe ethical can be used in any sentence that involves Bradley. The Open Records law was not put there to be abused as he is doing. People want to complain about taxes well guess where the money is coming from everytime he files right to know requests and the district has to oblige them. Residents do have a right to know whats on. The board is there for the best interest of the kids, stop wasting our damn tax dollars for these things. Then people wonder why the schools can't afford supplies and stuff its because the money is being spent on this crap.
Well ethics 101 is not practiced in lehighton do you think it is ethical to re-appoint someone that the voters just removed? I don't think so. Stern is as big an idiot as the other original members so what do you think was going to happen ...... good ole boys network sticks together.
JLeague—Maybe you haven’t been paying attention. If you were you might have noticed Mr. Bradley has been voting for education. He has voted for course approvals and many other programs that benefit the students of the district. Mr. Bradley was elected by people who wanted a voice on the board. Past boards ignored questions as they feel they are not obligated to answer to the taxpayers. The current majority is trying to block the process of finding those answers by REQUIRING Mr. Bradley to file RTK requests to get most of those answers. If you actually read the law written by our legislature you might learn something. The current board majority needs to stop fighting the questions. Board members are there to oversee the district by actually asking some questions instead of rubber stamping everything and do the job for which they were elected. In this manner they would be respecting the taxpayers whose funds they are spending and honoring their duty to the education of the kids. And sure let’s blame Mr. Bradley for the fact that supplies are lacking. That has been happening for at least the last 20 years, long before Bradley. Just keep watching the newspaper and you will see the corruption in many area school districts.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

March 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      
     

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed