Skip to main content

Game commission explains reason for clear-cut

  • Empty

    BOB FORD/TIMES NEWS

Published July 16. 2019 12:39PM

 

The Pennsylvania Game Commission recently clear-cut a 100-foot-wide stretch of trees in state game lands along Route 93 in Packer Township and Nesquehoning.

The project came about after Pennsylvania Department of Transportation warned the game commission that numerous dead trees along the road could fall onto passing cars.

The affected area totals about 20 acres, but state game lands 141, where the area is located, includes more than 17,000 acres.

So far, the trees have been removed on the east side of Route 93, where the game commission also recently conducted a controlled burn. The result is that the east side of the highway looks decimated. But the game commission said wildlife will quickly make use of the newly vacated space.

“If the hunters go out to that prescribed area this fall, there’s going to be all kinds of activity in there. The deer will be loving it, the bear will be loving it,” said Warren Harris, a forestry manager with the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

Harris said the project isn’t related to any wind turbine or natural gas infrastructure projects.

In January 2016, PennDOT’s Carbon County Management office contacted the game commission expressing concern about dead trees along Route 93. PennDOT said the game commission could be sued over damage from the trees.

“There were several dead and dying trees there that posed a hazard to the highway. If they were to fall and drop limbs, they would fall on the highway and pose a safety hazard,” Harris said.

The game commission made the decision to cut the 100-foot buffer. The primary reason was cost, but according to the game commission, it will also serve as a firebreak and promote wildlife habitat.

Hiring someone to take down the individual dead trees would have “been a significant expense to PGC. This treatment would avoid that expense,” according to the commission’s description of the project.

They also looked into selling the timber. It’s not uncommon for them to sell timber from game lands around the state.

The value of the timber did not exceed the cost of removing it, so the game commission had to pay a contractor to take down the trees, allowing the contractor to take any usable timber.

The project called for removal of any trees over 2 inches in diameter, except pitch pine and trees with significant wildlife value.

The game commission noted in its description of the project that it has several benefits. Route 93 is a firebreak, a barrier which stops the progress of wildfires, and the tree removal will widen that barrier.

The project will also increase the amount of sunlight which reaches Route 93, helping to melt ice and dry the road.

There are also environmental benefits. When an area is clear-cut, species including golden winged warblers make nests. If the area cut was 25 or 50 feet wide, Harris said, it would be easy for predators to find them. By widening the stretch to 100 feet, it gives the nesting species a better chance of success.

“It’s very easy for the predators to zigzag that area and wipe out all the species,” he said.

The game commission’s contractor was supposed to wrap up work on the project by June 30. Harris said the west side of the highway will be timbered in the same way, but he couldn’t say when.

 

Comments
This article seems like the clear cut is isolated to Route 93. But anyone who is observant and uses Game Lands throughout PA knows the clear cutting as increased an incredible amount in the last 2 years. I'm not saying is wrong or there is a quid pro by our lumber Gov. I'm just saying I have seen more old growth forest cut in the last three years, with no protest from environmental groups, than I have in my entire life. Are they finally doing it "right' now while they haven't been doing it right for the last 40 years? We used to rely on the press to investigate but those days are over i think.
Who knew we needed a 250 foot firebreak, after all these years? (100 ft on the east, 100 ft on the west, plus the road) Or that we had so many dead 100 ft tall trees that could fall and impede traffic? Or that trees with no leaves could shade the roadway, thereby affecting the melt rate of snow on Rt. 93?

The PennDOT assertion that there was a significant hazard from treefall/deadfall in the roadway is patently false. I've been traveling back and forth along Rt. 93, 3 or 4 times a week during the summer months, for 25 years, without a single incident or even a dodge. Moreover, the Rt. 93 situation pales in comparison to Rt. 80, where in the same vicinity, trees literally overhang the roadway.

What the Game Commission and PennDOT has managed to create, with precious little justification, is a 20 acre wasteland in a vulnerable high altitude (for PA) region. What was once a drive through backcountry Pennsylvania, we now have the aesthetics of a Philadelphia expressway. Given the sloooow recovery of the Blue Mountain over Palmerton (a fair measure), the scar on the landscape will still be evident 30 years from now, and well beyond my life-time.

What exactly is forestry in Pennsylvania? Is there even an attempt at achieving a balance between economics, practicality, aesthetics, wildlife management, ecology, and conservation? If so, I'm not seeing it in this Rt. 93 fiasco.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

October 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   
 

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed