Skip to main content

Washington warned us about ‘spirit of party’

Published November 18. 2019 11:58AM

In his farewell address to the nation in 1796, George Washington gave two primary warnings in the speech.

First was his global concern about “permanent alliances” with foreign countries.

The second warning concerned putting political party interests ahead of the interests of the nation. Washington didn’t consider himself a prophet but the “spirit of party” he foretold is not unlike the partisan divide we see gripping our nation and inciting American citizens today.

“Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally,” said Washington.

That address came at a crucial time during the struggle over ratification of our Constitution. A debate erupted over the transition from creating a new federal government to deciding how powerful that government would be. This opened the door to the formation of political factions or parties.

The Federalists, led by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, wanted a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists, led by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, favored states’ rights instead of centralized power. Washington was especially grieved by this heavyweight battle within his own cabinet.

The Federalists were allied with the commercial section of the country while their opponents drew their strength from the agricultural sector. That early divide reminds us of today’s political map showing the split between blue and red states.

Today’s attempt by Democrats to impeach a duly-elected president for “high crimes and misdemeanors” also mirrors the kind of partisan politics Washington warned about 223 years ago. Both Democratic and Republican House members today are in lockstep with their party leadership, not only over the current impeachment but for the long-range policy course for the nation.

Political parties have been called the life’s blood of a democracy while the military provides the security necessary for democracy to continue. But Washington, who historians regard as the first and last American president who transcended partisanship, foresaw the pitfalls.

Current survey data reflects our first president’s concerns about partisanship. Last year, Pew Research Center conducted a major survey of public views of our political system and American democracy. The yearlong study “Facts, Trust and Democracy” found that Democrats have grown less positive about elected officials who compromise.

In the past, Democrats were more likely than Republicans to have positive views of elected officials who make compromises, but that is no longer the case. Today, 46 percent of Democrats and 44 percent of Republicans say “they like elected officials who make compromises with people they disagree with.” Just a year earlier, Democrats were 23 percentage points more likely than Republicans to have positive views of elected officials who compromise.

As Democrats try to build a case for impeachment against a president they despise, Trump seems unworried by the accusations which are based on hearsay evidence. Both principals in this case, President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky, deny there was anything sordid in their phone conversations — no intimidation or bribery as the Democrats are charging. Trump even beat his Democratic accusers to the punch by releasing transcripts of the suspected calls.

Jake Novak, a political and economic analyst and former CNBC TV producer, wrote last month about how Trump’s poll numbers remain static and unaffected by the constant drum beat of accusations from the Democrats on the left and how the president’s fundraising numbers have actually increased. Novak wrote that very large number of Americans don’t have high levels of trust and respect for the government, that they’re buoyed by Trump’s drain-the-swamp promises and are fine with the president being that junkyard dog who digs out all of what Trump supporters see as deep state corruption.

Before launching into impeachment, House Democrats should have looked in the mirror to check their own performance numbers. A Gallup poll in June found that just 20 percent of Americans approved of the job Congress was doing and their overall approval rating hasn’t hit 30 percent in 10 years.

Adam Schiff isn’t doing his colleagues any favors with the sham impeachment circus. Those on the hot seat are the 31 Democrats from Trump-Pence districts who will face their home district voters when they run for re-election.

By Jim Zbick | tneditor@tnonline.com

Comments
Another stupid op-ed. Hey Zbick, show me the last time the congressional performance numbers for either party were favorable. It is always around 20% as a whole. What members of congress should look at is their own numbers in their district. I assure you all the democrats did that and have far better than the 40% numbers the president has.

But more importantly, how stupid to wrote a partisan article while repeating the warnings about partisanship by the first president. Typical garbage by Zbick. Hey Jim, why can't you sell your columns anywhere else?
You are one nasty, angry and politically biased person.
The point of this column is importance of that which the founding fathers warned us all against.
You likely didn't read it, because you were too busy loading your shotgun to shoot the messenger.
Taking on, and on, and on.
You crack me up "Joe".
I’m pointing out the irony of zbicks repeat of Washington’s warning coupled with his usual partisan slant.

I’m glad he at least learned to cite the sources of his statistics but why would he cite a Gallup poll on congressional approval from June when this has been updated multiple times since then? Last week Gallup had it at 25%...curious that he randomly picked june.

Anyway, partisanship is a problem but so are 3rd rate columns. There is a reason why Zbick is only in one tiny paper.
Washington was exactly right as the writer pointed out, I would love to see in Congress 10 - 20 parties representing the interests of the American people. And let’s face it, both the republicans and democrats are corrupt beyond hope, the GOP is no longer the party of Lincoln or Reagan, and the dnc is no longer the party of Kennedy or even Obama! Have you heard Barack Obama lately? Today’s democrats are so left wing even Obama sounds like a tea party conservative.
We need to ditch the status quo, and frankly there are parties with much better platforms, libertarians, constitutionalists, greens, “rent is too damn high party”.
It’s time to move away from the monopoly that’s tearing us apart. It’s ok to change parties too, Christopher Hitchens was a Trotskyist before becoming center left libertarian here in the USA.
Good Post Tony.
Did you know that Washington refused to get involved in the war between the new French Republic and the European monarchs, earning the wrath of the Democratic-Republican Party members? Here's the interesting part, several of the Democratic-Republican higher ups were newspaper editors.
Media bullying from Thomas Jefferson's Party.
As you know, the first political party, Hamilton's "Federalist's" would sharply come against the party of Jefferson, the Democratic-Republicans in the matters of the French Revolution. Which leads me to another relevant point... Foreign Interference (Collusion). wink
Hey, Washington quickly saw reason for party restraint. We need a government empowered by the consent of the people. Washington knew parties ultimately could distract the government from serving the people, destroying the very freedoms established by folks like Washington, Hamilton, and Jefferson. Do we see that today?
Still pertinent to this very day. Why was Washington so gifted in wisdom?
Beyond that mike, look at Lincoln, who is loved and admired today but in his time was hated, so much so the famous actor John Wilkes booth saw reason to kill him. This bitter two party partisanship is not healthy
Again, repeating the talking points of the trump administration. Lincoln came in presiding over a split nation but by his re-election he had massive support, winning 55% of the vote in a 4 way contest, the highest percentage in over half a century.

But your post reveals your ethnocentrism a bit. You can make an argument that there were whites who hated Lincoln, mainly in the south, but he sure had broad support from the slaves totaling more than 4,000,000. Had they been able to vote, clearly Lincoln would have won by a historic count in 1864
Ha Ha Ha
Take on, Take on, Take on.
You totally missed it "Joe".
You are highly educated, yet have no where to use it.
And in this corner, weighing in at 120lbs. ... ... "Joe"
Washington had vision.
“Where there is no vision the people perish,” Proverbs 29:18
Washington was also a leader who prayed to God Daily.
I believe God gave Washington that “prophetic vision” (a special revelation or God’s Word), as spoken of in that Proverb by Solomon.
History backs me on this.
America has been blessed by God, we need to bless God in return.
I say this as an American.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

April 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
   

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed