Lehighton projects $3.49M deficit
Lehighton Area School District’s board of directors narrowly passed a preliminary 2020-21 general fund budget Wednesday night, which calls for a $3.49 million deficit.
The spending plan, which district administrators said will likely be revised “numerous times” before final adoption in June, passed by a 5-4 vote.
Directors Wayne Wentz, Rita Spinelli, Larry Stern, Stephen Holland and Nathan Foeller voted in favor of the budget, while David Bradley, Joy Beers, Gail Maholick and Richard Beltz were opposed.
“This is a very preliminary budget because a lot of the key components are unknown at this time,” business administrator Patricia Denicola told the board. “They include state revenue, professional staff salaries and special education costs, to name a few.”
Lehighton is currently negotiating a contract with its teachers. The current contract was approved in November 2015 and runs through Aug. 31, 2020.
Denicola said Lehighton’s budget will be discussed at each finance committee meeting leading up until June with multiple opportunities for revision.
Before the approval, Bradley lobbied his colleagues to table the budget vote.
“I think we should postpone this so we have time to review it with fidelity,” Bradley said. “We only got the budget at 2 p.m. today. This district is spending more than you take in year after year and you’re going bankrupt.”
Bradley took issue with the fact that Lehighton’s business office, and not board members themselves, drafted the budget.
“The budget is our responsibility,” he told his fellow board members. “We do not have authority to let them do it for us.”
Beers backed Bradley’s comments, saying she didn’t feel the board had enough input and oversight.
“In past boards I have been a part of, members collectively make a decision on what things money will be spent on and then create an outline of what the budget will be before the business administrator puts together the financial document,” Beers said.
Denicola has said she strives to budget using year-end actuals to cut down on historical overruns.
Before Denicola started in the district last March, Lehighton budgeted for $40.69 million in expenditures for 2018-19, but actually spent $43.9 million. In 2017-18, it budgeted $40.99 million and spent $42.39 million. In 2016-17, it budgeted $39.17 million and spent $41.37 million. In 2015-16, it budgeted $38.65 million and spent $44.01 million.
“In those years, we were never alerted we were running in a deficit,” Stern said. “This budget number uses actuals versus the fictitious $40 million budgets presented in past. We can sit here and lie to each other and make things up. We all understand we have an issue and need to try to work together to find a solution to the issues.”
Lehighton’s 2019-20 budget called for revenues of $41,361,426, compared to expenses of $43,894,495.
Revenues for the preliminary 2020-21 plan are projected at $40,924,886, with expenditures at $44,416,546.
Lehighton’s Act 1 index for 2020-21 is 3.6%, meaning the district can’t raise taxes more than that without seeking exceptions from the state.
Comments
What immoral bunch of yahoo's would PLAN to consume MORE then they rake in?
State shows declining enrollment.
This district has unchecked spending.
This district obstructs the board from seeing the books. It is as if these five rubber-stampers openly ask the fox to check the hen house and do the egg count with a blind trust.
Someone should ask Wayne Wentz about the no tax increases for the legacy of debt crushing the district.
Someone should ask Rita Spinelli if she can read a budget report and then ask where are the downsizes?
Someone should ask Steve Holland if he has read it or even has a copy. Remember the feasibility study he admitted to not reading or having?
Someone should ask Nathan Foeller, the self proclaimed Christian business person, if it is moral to spend more that you rake in?
And how long can that go on?
Someone should ask Larry Stern why he ignored the budget choices that offered a TAX DECREASE and opted to let the administration, the people this budget pays to create the budget.
And someone should ask President Stern if this wife's boss, the Superintendent, approved the idea of a planning on spending more than the community currently provides.
And here I thought the tax train was derailed when we showed the board how the district could increase educational results and reduce taxes with proper oversight and measuring the district's KPI's.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.
A moral public servant.
Did you get a chance to review or vote on this budget?
Was your input sought?
If you want justice, file a Formal Written Complaint in accordance with Policy 906. Include the admissions of the board that said the administration wrote the budget, and Nathan, Wayne, Rita and other failed on their duty, the fidelity standard. The evidence is Inna deficit budget, and the Times News meeting video.
Hold your government accountable for a change.
Write it here but file it with the district.
Is it obvious that the Superintendent's face turns flush, red really, when he is asked a question and has to create a story?
So who is handling the negotiations again? The board assigned Cleaver right? Yeah, that doesn't sound like the most morally sound decision.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.
Good evening. Are you trying to show Larry Stern and the other cronies are not telling the truth? Mr. Immunity himself?
Now that is just funny stuff. Larry Stern tells the truth.
Suzanne Howland failed to attend the budget meeting.
Dan Williams failed to attend the budget meeting.
Mark McGalla failed to attend the budget meeting.
And many others failed to attend the budget meeting.
And common sense failed to penetrate the Fab 5. The legacy of debt and immoral board PLAN TO SPEND more than they rake in.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.
Running over budget
Students being harmed or injured
Violations of RTK laws and policy
Expanding the size of government
Selective enforcement issues
Failing to educate all above proficient
Lying to the public
Putting sports over education
Silencing a community
Failing to protect the students
Failing to save the community
Stubborn and arrogance rule vs. public servants.
These are the things that apparently need fixing from a moral point of view.
Lawful Transparency.fixes all of it.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.
Seriously pal, you NEED to give us your solution on how to get this budget fixed. All you ever do, is stir the pot and poke at people . You were practically kissing the new board members‘ butt (Nathan) when he won and now, you’re taking cheap shots.
Here is what I see, besides you being a bully (great role model by the way) you don’t give solutions on how to fix the budget because you don’t know how. Didn’t you have some tax issues or nonpayment of taxes with your business?
Anyway...start acting like an adult and start treating people with respect.
2) Analysis of data w/admin
3) Board assigns transparent budget
4) Stakeholders review budget advise board
5) Board proposes budget
6) Budget adjusted after stakeholder review
7) Community and board agree, board votes.
The budget should be balanced
The budget should not grow past the Cost of living.
The staff and student ratio should be reviewed
Benefit packages need to be adjusted
Hiring needs to be transparent
Best staff needs to be hired
Test scores and actual learning need to be tested and proven to the Stakeholders satisfactions - they are the boss.
Fixed. I proposed a slight budget increases the included A TAX REDUCTION, by cutting corruption and waste.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.
If you were given the # of students, enrollment projections, five years financial history, Taxrolls, teachers schedules and # students served, job description and pay for ever staff member, would you help? Would you be a free public stakeholder auditor helping the district provide the proper disbursement of educational benefits to our community students ensuring 100 meet the standard proficient level?
I am counting on about 100 reviewing, and at least 10 doing the deep dive, and the rest of the community to double-check the results these auditors report. Together, this can be fixed. Lawful transparency wins everytime.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.
FYI: Lehighton is currently at the 86th percentile in taxes in the state, and 54th percentile in testing, draw your own conclusions
Complaints about violations of LASD policy, or lack of transparency from Larry's wife's boss the Superintendent, failures to supervise students, failures to protect the students, or follow proper protocol.
Sincerely,
Citizen David F. Bradley, Sr.