Skip to main content

Impact of turbines must be investigated

Published March 02. 2019 06:36AM

To the editor:

The ink is barely dry on the denial of a special exemption for industrial wind turbines in the Bethlehem Watershed, and already Carbon County is targeted for another industrial wind park, on scenic Broad Mountain in Packer Township. Broad Mountain is a popular recreation area and an ecological gem with diverse habitats for rare species of plants and animals native to the Poconos.

A concern in this area is the impact the project could have on endangered bats. Preliminary project maps show turbines located roughly 5 miles northwest of Lehigh Gorge and State Game Land 141. These are important bat habitats in Carbon County, where bats are known to roost in rock crevices along the cliffs above the Lehigh River.

Radio tracking studies show that bats travel distances up to 6 miles or more from the roost to feed, depending on the season and the availability or scarcity of food. This could place the turbines within the foraging range of bats roosting at these sites. Researchers estimate that hundreds of thousands of bats are killed by wind turbines every year in North America. There is evidence that bats are attracted to wind turbines because of large concentrations of insects around the turbines.

Federal and state wildlife officials recently confirmed the importance of protecting bats in Pennsylvania and restoring populations decimated by disease and habitat loss. These concerns, and the impact of the turbines on local communities, must be thoroughly investigated before any permits are considered for this project.

Juliet Perrin

Albrightsville

Comments
Over the past 40 years, wind energy – which supplies les than 5% of US electricity today, has received over US$30 billion in federal subsidies and grants. Wind power is a waste of time and money, but the green freaks will argue that to their death. Taxpayers subsidize this green energy beyond what's ever being reported, and the green freaks buy into these resources as actually being viable. It would be laughable if it wasn't helping to drain the country down.
I also don't want these things on state land, if that's where they plan on sticking them.
So over 40 years, wind energy has received $30 Billion. That is about $750 million yearly.

Care to guess how much fossil fuel gets in subsidies yearly? $20 billion. Stretched over 40 years that is $800 Billion. That means wind energy gets only 3.8% of the subsidy fossil fuels receive. So at 5% of electricity, I would say Wind energy is not getting its fair share.

None should be getting subsidized. In you stats, you left out the ROI from Coal, Gas, and Oil.
A heck of a lot more electric from fossil fuels than the wind could ever provide.
I’ll debate Econ with you any time. ROI needs to also account for the negative externalities of fossil fuel from pollution, climate change, disease, terrorism, etc that is a direct result of the fossil fuel industry. Take this in account and you understand why there is a push to renewables.
These things are a ridiculous eyesore. I'm all for clean energy, but these things are ugly, loud and are detrimental to wildlife. We've already lost bat population to White Nose. Solar parks are much less invasive and more efficient. But, I guess it's a mute point, since a County Commissioner already received a campaign contribution. A well known business family has been helping grease the wheels, they're also well established donors to Republican candidates, and it's sure there is something in it for them. Land owners? I guess we'll see.
Hey RU, wouldn't it be nice if we could all unite around something good for the common? I don't think greed from evil is any respecter of party affiliation. TEA
Can't we all just get along? Getting along means giving in to the foul supporters of a Republican Dystopia.
Funny how it's ok to rundown a Democrat, but now he speaks of unity. Time will expose the facts.... and the Republican players.
It is not a "special exemption" but rather a "special exception" - which is a permitted use in zoning that allows for conditions to protect the health safety and welfare of the public. Zoning approval is what you are referring to in Penn Forest Twp. Protecting bats is not something that zoning usually per se addresses... however, a PNDI search should be required, and that is where the DEP via your conservation district even in absence of a DEP permit being needed may yield power. A zoning permit could not be issued unless the C-D signs off. A guess is that protecting bats may not be enough to defeat the proposed project.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

January 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   
 

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed