Skip to main content

Lehighton nurses defend school eye exams

Published March 27. 2019 12:50PM

Lehighton Area School District’s school nurses strongly defended their state-mandated eye exams at a board meeting Tuesday night, responding to board members who believe the job could be done by volunteers from the Lions Club instead.

“I respectfully ask the school board to reverse their decision to have the Lions Club perform vision screenings for K-12 in our school district. We are currently capable of completing this job on our own as we have the last 35 years,” said school nurse Colleen Harleman.

Harleman and Lehighton Area High School nurse Abbie Guardiani were responding to comments from board member Gail Maholick, who said last month that the Lions’ exam was superior to the nurses’.

The nurses said that the Lions test has its place, particularly with young children, but it is not approved by the state for mandated student eye exams.

Maholick said the Lions’ test should still be offered as an option, and board member David Bradley said that the Lions’ test is superior to the nurses’ exam.

“It would be wrong of us not to accept this generous opportunity for all our students and community members, across the community, should have this opportunity if they’re willing to help us,” Bradley said.

Guardiani and Harleman, who each have 35 years experience as school nurses, presented information comparing the two exam methods and spoke about their experience conducting eye exams in the district.

Guardiani said that the nurses in the district have combined to perform more than 56,000 eye exams over the years, and she has performed at least 28,000 by herself alone.

“When performing our eye exams, the school nurse who is trained in head-to-toe assessment uses that opportunity to see each child, as a time not just set aside for an eye exam,” Guardiani said.

The nurses said the Titmus machine they use is approved by the state for mandated annual eye exams the Lions’ is not, and the school’s has a lower cost of maintenance.

By contrast, Harleman said, the Welch-Allyn screener used by the Lions Club’s Kids Sight program does not meet the state’s requirements, and costs much more to maintain.

Harleman cited a letter from the coordinator of the Kids Sight program, who said they are primarily targeting children ages 0-6. She said the machine is designed specifically for young children and people who are incapable of reading an eye chart.

Resident Barbara Bowes said the Lions exam could be of value because it detects tumors behind the eye. She said even if the odds are slim, it could be lifesaving for a child who benefits from it.

Guardiani said that eye tumors and strabismus are more common in preschool-aged children.

“I see lots of value in it when it’s used where it’s meant to be used, which is from ages 0-6, where you’re going to be more likely to find that problem,” she said.

Guardiani stressed to the board that the annual eye exam represents much more than just an evaluation of a student’s eyesight.

She said it’s the only time that the nurses get to see every student in school.

They use the opportunity to do a “head-to-toe visual assessment” of the students for clues which may suggest a need for medical attention.

“An eye exam is not just an eye exam. It is an opportunity for a medical professional to do what we do best. It is far more than meeting a state mandate,” Guardiani said.

Bradley added that some parents may not want the school nurse to do a head-to-toe assessment of their child during the eye exam.

“I’m completely against that. I’m for personal privacy,” he said.

Guardiani defended her approach, saying it is what she and her colleagues are trained and certified to do as nurses. She said in one instance during an eye exam, she became concerned about an abnormal dark spot on a student’s ear, which turned out to be a precancerous lesion.

“Sir, I am a registered nurse, and I do head-to-toe eye exams when I walk in a room. It’s what I do. I am a nurse for 40 years. I look at every single person, and I assess them,” she said.

School board member Joy Beers said she would like to see students have an option to get the Lions’ exam because it has benefits.

“I think there’s a benefit in what the Lions Club offers, and I don’t see why we can’t have the two systems working in tandem,” she said.

Guardiani pointed out that the Lions’ exam requires students to take home and return a permission slip. When the exam is complete, they have to take home the printed results.

“Those permission slips aren’t even going home, much less coming back,” she said.

Bradley said that the Lions’ vision screener has been recognized by the Harvard Business Review for its ability to quickly conduct vision screenings.

The nurses said they would like to see the Lions continue to help provide financial support for students who need glasses and follow-up vision appointments.

“What we do require is assistance in obtaining vision exams and eyeglasses for students who fail the screening but have no insurance or financial resources to do so,” Harleman said.

Comments
What I said, and you can see it on the video, is that the Lion's Club Exam could be used in conjunction with the eye exam they do now. Not necessarily replace the existing exam. I found it odd that the cost of the technology and it's maintenance and upkeep was even mentioned. It has no relevance as it was purchased and is maintained by the Lion's Club. While it was mentioned prior to this last meeting at some point that this exam might want to be used to replace the existing one since the technology is not accepted by the Health Dept. for conducting the mandated eye exams, that point is moot. I still feel that including this screening in the eye exam protocol has benefit to the students. It is provided free of charge and if it detects something the other exam cannot and saves one child's sight it is worth the extra effort and paperwork. Common sense.
Community,

Good afternoon. Only after 800+ children and their parents requested the free service did the rest of the district get blocked. The board unanimously voted for open access to the district, after the Elementary School success, fear of districtwide adoption set in.

Fear and ignorance concerning new technology has been in existence since the invention of the wheel. I am sure once it is recognized that Lion's club is not trying to take these nurses' jobs but help the children, their attitude will change. Give it time.

This technology has revolutionized eye care around the world, Lehighton will catch up. Conversations concerning parent's rights, student's rights and transparency are saving the district. Give it time, the faster we restore citizen's voices and proper governance, the faster Lehighton will catch up. Once fixed, the benefits for the students will be exponential.

Sincerely,

Citizen David F. Bradley. Sr.


So nurses Guardiani and Harlemanhas have the ability to maybe save a childs eyesight and they won't do it.
The lehighton school district not only needs a new administration, they need new nurses.
The nurses made it very clear that the device used by the Lions is intended for use in younger children, specifically ages brith through 6 years old. I didn’t hear anything that tells me that they opposed the testing being offered in the elementary school, where 75% of the students were able to be part of the testing. Nor did the nurses complain about the additional time and paperwork that they spent facilitating the Lions’ testing.

The issue is using a device that does not meet all the requirements of the state-mandated testing. As far as using the device in addition to the nurses’ current device, I’m not sure the scheduling would be compatible. The Lions’ device is intended for a quick, point-and-shoot vision assessment. The nurses explained that they normally spend several minutes one-on-one with each student. I’m guessing that it takes the nurses more than a couple days to complete their eye exams. Would the Lions be willing to sit at the school for a week or more to allow the nurses to use their device? Is that really an efficient use of the Lions volunteers’ time?

As a parent of a middle school student, I’d be willing to bet that if the permission slips are sent home in the middle and high schools, a very small percentage will even be returned. That fact alone makes the transition from offering eye exams to conducting mandated exams a difficult one.

From the Lions website: “Lions KidSight USA Foundation is a nationwide program to safeguard the vision of children, concentrating on kids aged 6 months through 6 years, but screening through grade 12 where possible.”

Statistics from the American Cancer Society tell us that a child in the US has a roughly .0012% chance of developing an eye tumor in a given year. The American Cancer Society also states that these eye tumors (retinoblastoma) RARELY OCCUR in children older than 6. That gives the current issue some perspective. Before we jump into pushing this program through the entire school system, perhaps we should evaluate the time and effort that will be required of our staff and nurses.

The Lions’ program is a great one. Let’s steer those resources to where they’ll have the greatest potential.

Finally, Mr. Bradley’s grilling of the nurses after their presentation was uncalled for. His claim that Mrs. Guardiani said that the parents may not be doing their job is totally false - she said nothing that even resembled this. Our school nurses to a wonderful job serving our children and they deserve to be treated with so much more respect than they were shown in this meeting.
Nathan Foeller, from your statement above, "The American Cancer Society also states that these eye tumors (retinoblastoma) RARELY OCCUR in children older than 6." Rarely is a relative term, how rare is rarely? If the Lion's exam saves the sight or the life of one ONE child, is it not worth the extra work? And as far as scheduling goes, common sense dictates that the nurses can do their normal exams and then the Lions can come in and do theirs. It only takes a few seconds. The parents can decide if they would like to have this done. A motion was made, it passed unanimously to offer the testing in K-12. It is not the Superintendent's, the nurses or anyone else's place to decide to ignore the outcome. Only the parents get to make that decision. That offer has now been denied to both the parents and the children. It was not the nurse's right, nor the Superintendent's to ignore a legally passed motion, no matter how they feel on the subject.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

March 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      
     

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed