Skip to main content

Tamaqua teachers’ union issues response to gun policy

Published April 17. 2019 12:46PM

The Tamaqua Education Association has issued a statement in response to the school board’s decision to move forward with the policy to arm trained staff in the schools.

The board discussed the move at its meeting Tuesday night.

Steven J Cholish, PSEA/NEA UniServ Representative, issued the following statement Wednesday morning:

“The Tamaqua Education Association is disappointed by the school district’s decision to prematurely reinstate this policy while a court challenge remains underway.

“The Tamaqua EA maintains that this policy is a violation of the Pennsylvania School Code and other state laws that are very specific about who can carry firearms in our schools. We believe that it puts every teacher, student, administrator, or visitor who enters a Tamaqua school building at risk in a dangerous situation. Parents have also spoken out against this policy and the professionals of the Tamaqua Education Association are prepared to see this court challenge through to the bitter end.”

Cholish said the union is awaiting a trial date.

The statement continues, “Only a school police officer or school resource officer with state-required weapons training and experience is permitted by state law to carry and use firearms in a school. Teachers and support professionals aren’t trained law enforcement officers. Their job is to teach kids.

“The district’s policy ignores this state law and allows school employees without the proper training to carry and use firearms in school. We must follow the law to ensure students and staff remain safe. That is our top priority.”

In addition to the teachers’ union, four families have joined in a lawsuit to protest the policy.

Comments
Pennsylvania School Code dates to 1949, so whatever it said back then about who can and can not carry, is irrelevant. It's funny that a union would throw themselves in to this argument. The teachers union has enough bad press and enough problems on their own. Say... why do "Good" teachers continue to pay dues to these gangsters of extortion (union)?
I hold near and dear to our US Constitution, not so to the PA School Code.
Good try. The original intent of the written Constitution is plain and clear.
The PA School Code isn't clear on anything. The School Code is a living document, the Constitution isn't. Again, good try, but ones an apple the other a prune, no comparison.
The unions will not object to the school hiring dues paying union member guards though! For them, it is all about expanding their dues paying membership base.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

February 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      
 

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed