Climate Change Threatens Our Food Supply
Dear Editor,
“Climate Change Threatens World Food Supply” was the lead story in recent newspapers. It was prompted by the release of a summary report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, staffed by more than 100 experts from 52 countries. The report details how climate change is threatening our world’s food and water supplies — turning arable land to desert, degrading soil and raising the frequency of devastating weather conditions.
It concludes that avoiding wholesale starvation and mass migrations requires fundamental changes in current animal agriculture and land management practices, which account for 23 percent of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. The conclusions of the IPCC report match closely those by Oxford University in 2017 and by Chatham House in 2015.
A 2010 United Nations report blames animal agriculture for 19% of greenhouse gas emissions, 70% of freshwater use, and 38% of land use. All reports recommend a massive shift to plant-based eating.
In an environmentally sustainable world, meat and dairy products in our diet must be replaced by vegetables, fruits and grains, just as fossil fuels are replaced by wind, solar and other pollution-free energy sources. Our next visit to the supermarket provides a superb starting point.
Sincerely,
Eric Peters
Walnutport
Comments
Be very careful where you get your information on these "Sustainable" energy sources, as there's much false reporting going on these days. Integrity is a thing of the past with many.
Solar sucks, I own it, it's a novelty at most, and it's not reliable.
But thanks for you suckers who subsidized it. He He He
I said it's not reliable. Clouds is just one reason I have with reduced performance, another is when I do my wind direction test. (wink)
I was only looking at wind and solar. You crack me up. Thanks for the list, that was important.
Wind and solar make up a combined 14%, double your claim. Again, are you making up numbers or just lying?
U.S. electricity generation by source, amount, and share of total in 2018:
Energy source Billion kWh Share of total
Total - all sources 4,178
Fossil fuels (total) 2,651 63.5%
Natural gas 1,468 35.1%
Coal 1,146 27.4%
Petroleum (total) 25 0.6%
Petroleum liquids 16 0.4%
Petroleum coke 9 0.2%
Other gases 12 0.3%
Nuclear 807 19.3%
Renewables (total) 713 17.1%
Hydropower 292
7.0%
Wind 275 6.6%
Biomass (total) 63 1.5%
Wood 41 1.0%
Landfill gas 11 0.3%
Municipal solid waste (biogenic) 7 0.2%
Other biomass waste 3 0.1%
Solar (total) 67
1.6%
Photovoltaic 63
1.5%
Solar thermal 4
0.1%
Geothermal 17 0.4%
Pumped storage hydropower3 -6 -0.1%
Other sources 13 0.3%
Be aware, the U.N. is not on our side.
Be very careful what you read. The newspaper might be the worst source of information.
As for the United Nations? The U.N. should be disbanded, have its New York building torn down, and all putrid memory, discarded from our history.
Contrast this with the climate change debate, there is a side of which Joe Bastardi is on, that insists man is incapable of causing changes in the climate and environment, and that’s just fundamentally inaccurate, especially when we consider other environmental impacts mankind had made, like, lead in the water, DDT, plastics in the oceans etc.
Rambo, Levite, you may not want to believe in manmade climate change, and I will never convince either of you, but please do not dismiss the science, the history of things we’ve done in the past, and let’s not pass on a planet that is toxic to the next generation. Earth is the only home we know, let’s keep it clean, and healthy for all.
Now I'm just a ham-n-Egger, but, here's a link to what NASA personnel have to say.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=nasa+says+global+warming+hoax&view=detail&mid=419343514E9B13D055DB419343514E9B13D055DB&FORM=VIRE
As for me? Al Gore and the likes who, politicized environmental concerns, have gotten me to the point of burning tires in the back yard, just to see which way the wind is blowing.
It's been well documented that "global warming" and "climate change" has been lied about, and misrepresented. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Climategate scientists choose to put forth false information, and climate realities, they choose to hide. As a result of this style of science corruption, I do not believe this branch of science any longer. Congress should defund climate science research for now, as it's mostly baloney, but what do I know besides wind direction?
Try this
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jun/19/james-hansen-nasa-scientist-climate-change-warning?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
There's a system that assesses surface temperatures established in 2005 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, (NOAA) which debunks the belief that mankind is catastrophically impacting the global climate. If man has an influence, it's on the method of data collection, and that influence will be ignored if the resulting data follows the expectation. No warming going on Eric
Like a small child, he expects you to be intimidated by his manly name-calling ability.
Rambo shows so much disrespect on these comment boards that I am surprised he has not been asked to refrain from posting.