Skip to main content

When telling truth is politically incorrect

Published January 14. 2020 12:18PM

Once upon a time, telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth was considered an admirable trait. Today, to be that blunt can be a liability that is likely to bring instant criticism and harsh social media attacks.

To counter this possible reprisal, we hold back, pull our punches, measure our words.

Last month, Bethlehem Area Superintendent of Schools Joseph Roy, a plain-speaking kind of guy who was named “Superintendent of the Year” in Pennsylvania in 2016, was commenting on why he believed parents send their children to charter schools. Here is what he said, which caused immediate backlash, even a call for his resignation by a board president of a neighboring district.

“The honest fact is, not all, but some parents send their kids from urban districts to charters to avoid having their kids be with kids coming from poverty or kids with skin that doesn’t look like theirs,” Roy said. “That’s a fact.”

Understand that Roy also mentioned other reasons, too — longer school days, specific academic programs, bus transportation and dress codes.

But it was his inclusion of race among the reasons that angered charter school proponents, including parents of charter school students in his own district, and Shamim Pakzad, president of the Saucon Valley School Board, who called on Roy to resign or be censured.

Roy has refused to apologize for telling the truth, and Bethlehem School Board President Michael Faccinetto and the rest of the board support Roy and wrote a letter to the neighboring district’s board.

“Let me be crystal clear: This board — all nine publicly elected members — support Dr. Roy and echo his comments,” Faccinetto said. “We will not back down in the fight for charter reform, and we will not ask Dr. Roy to back down or be silenced because a few unelected lobbyists disagree with the facts.

Faccinetto said of Pakzad, “He has no right to use his access to the dais to attack another superintendent.”

Just as with many area districts, Bethlehem’s charter school bill has been growing dramatically. More than 2,000 Bethlehem district students attend these schools, and this costs the district’s taxpayers $30 million annually.

Saying he personally knows of families who send their children to charter schools for this reason, Faccinetto said when an uncomfortable topic such as this is raised and hits home, there is angry reaction.

Joining the opposition to Roy’s comments was the Pennsylvania Coalition of Public Charter Schools, which characterized Roy’s statement as “malicious, defamatory and false.”

But a study by Steven Glazerman and Dallas Dotter of Mathematics Policy Research confirms Roy’s assertion. The researchers tested a number of factors as to why parents choose schools, including proximity, test scores, after-school activities, uniform policies, class size, crime and the racial and socio-economic makeup of the student body.

They found that just three of these categories were major factors in choices. Parents preferred high test scores, schools closer to home and schools where their own child would be alongside more peers of his or her race and class.

White and higher-income applicants had the strongest preferences for their children to remain in their own predominantly white group, while black elementary school parents were essentially “indifferent” to a school’s racial makeup, the researchers found. The findings for Hispanic elementary and middle school parents were not statistically significant, they said.

Roy has been a frequent critic of how charter schools are funded and how badly needed taxpayer dollars are funneled to these alternate schools at the expense of public schools throughout the Commonwealth. He has joined Gov. Tom Wolf in calling for a revamping of the charter school system.

As for Roy “telling it like it is” on this topic, a recent survey by the More in Common international initiative found that a large majority of Americans, even young ones, are sick and tired of the trend in political correctness.

By Bruce Frassinelli | tneditor@tnonline.com

Comments
Its hard to understand why Bruce's dialogue did not including the PC correct words like:

Busing, Personnel Safety, desegregation & above all of them.........DIVERSITY!

==================================================

#Diversity SUXs, build the Wall & build the Pipeline with Windmills to run the electrical pumps.
Mano...
You forgot a word, "Sustainable"
These government school elites are more accepting of a teacher dropping "F" bombs in class, than they are a taxpayer supporting "Charter Schools" at the podium of a School Board Meeting.
The bullies who run the government training camps (AKA Public Schools) hate competition. Charter schools threaten them with competition, and, charters "Steal" away precious funding. It's just not "Sustainable".
I thought you and Mike were so concerned about school taxes, saving money, not spending more tax payer money. Look it up. Charter schools are sucking money away from public schools and they are not any better. Look that up too.

You are in such a hurry to "reply" that you rarely get anyone's point. Add to that, your resentful and repellent guard for anything conservative, and you appear half baked. I don't dispute Charters take money from the SD, in fact that's my point. The district want it all for themselves, like the spoiled brat kid who wants all the toys. In reality, the SD wants to stave off competition by starving competition of any tax money. I have looked up much, and we the TEA folks have offered solutions in many ways, only to be pushed to the side.
No sense wasting my time with you, as, you stated in a post recently... "I stopped reading your post..."
You are like the other progressive/lib "Joe", who only reads to respond, not to gain insight.
I'll just say this. The government does not belong in education at all. Brown Coats?
Charter schools make taxes go up Mike. Pretty basic finance, it is cheaper to educate 10,000 students with 5 school than it would be to educate 10,000 students with 10 schools. Think of it this way, if you have a family of four, would it be cheaper to live in one house or split up into two houses?

I don't read to respond, I try to understand, ask questions and provide a reasoned response. You name call!! Please
Districts that lose students to charter schools, receive less funds.
How does that cost the taxpayer more?
Any added costs aren't due to the Charter School, they result from rigid structuring of S Districts, that prevent districts from reducing costs as students leave. Who and what creates that problem?
Districts build new stadiums, buildings, and hire permanent teachers, and when enrollment drops
for any reason, not just competition, the District can't afford what they forced upon the taxpayer.
You wouldn't run a business like that.
Where do you think the funds that support the charter school come from? Taxpayers. Again, my example of a family holds here. It is always cheaper to operate less sites by operating one bigger site because you save money on overhead and support services. If you have one High School now, you have one set of administrators. If you open a charter school, you now have two sets of administrators for the same number of students. You also have two busing companies, two cafeterias and staff, two heating systems, two water bills, two electric bills, two parking lots to plow, two properties to mow, two faculties, etc etc. Much of the costs are going to be fixed, or at least inelastic, in that just because less students go there doesn't mean the costs to maintain and administer the school goes down. So if it costs $10m this year to educate all the students in the district with one HS, its going to cost maybe $12-15m to educate the same number of students with two high schools because the costs will go up to support duplication of services at both schools

Look up the definition of "economies of scale", its about as basic of a finance concept you could have. I’m not pointing this out to Shane you for not having an understanding of this concept, I’m pointing it out to demonstrate this isn’t me pulling something out of thin air. Many people not exposed to finance in an organization don’t understand this so I’m happy to try to explain.
Thanks Bruce, a great article. Students learn better and have a deeper understanding of a subject if they are challenged by others (students) that have had different experiences. Many problems in life are complex, not black and white or right and wrong. Its important for future problem solving in our country to include different perspectives. However racial ranking (hierarchy) is engrained in people's minds. Some parents don't want their kids exposed to the lower rank in their school.

National Academics found that kids in White and Affluent Schools felt high rates of anxiety, and there was more cheating and bullying.

The Trump Presidency has stoked fear and division. He exploits peoples prejudices and racist attitudes. His words enable hate for the "others." Right Wing Radio and TV promotes their prejudices daily.

"If you can convince the lowest White Man, he's better than the highest Colored Man, he won't even notice a Con Man".
Lyndon B. Johnson - 36th President of the United States.

I added a few more sentences in order to be clearer for you. You really don't get the School Super's point, my point or LBJ's point on racism.............you don't want to get the point.

LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act on July 2nd 1964.
The 14th Amendment.
Martin Luther King Jr. was at the signing.
Johnson was a Waste and Bully;
He was so bad that he did not run for president a second time knowing he was a failure.
That is by his own actions and admission.

He signed the Civil Rights act purely to get more votes and it back fired on him.
Kept the Vietnam war going killing our people for his political gain which failed him.

Oh, lets not forget his Diversity signature program:
"affirmative action"
Reverse discrimination became an issue, epitomized by the famous Bakke case in 1978. Allan Bakke, a white male, had been rejected two years in a row by a medical school that had accepted less qualified minority applicants-the school had a separate admissions policy for minorities.............
Just who would rather have doing surgery on you>? A Diverse person?

#Diversity SUXs, build the Wall, build the pipeline & windmills too
LBJ and his Political Party perceived that, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
Since LBJ was a man of few morals, his embrace of civil rights were likely, not based on morality.
While I agree with Churchill, “history is written by the victors,”
I must warn that since the days of LBJ, our history has been taught by progressives.
I have finally found something that Obama said, that I agree with...
(about LBJ) "During his first 20 years in Congress," Obama said, "he opposed every civil rights bill that came up for a vote, once calling the push for federal legislation a farce and a shame."
It's been reported by many, how the "n" word rolled off LBJ's lips.
But the blood on his hands in the VietNam war should always remain, and be a permanent staining in the "History" of our Great Nation.
The highly educated get it wrong all too often. Perhaps this is why the progressives want to stop teaching our next generation from writing, or reading cursive. Thank about that!
*** Man, Just because a black man got accepted to Medical School does not mean he completed the requirements. He just got accepted. The public does not realize that hundreds of people get accepted into Medical programs every year (P. Therapy, Nursing) and are quickly weeded out if they do not meet the required standards or grades required. A Doctor has to take an extra Surgical Residency and also meet those requirements. The Bakke case of 1978 proved nothing about the END POINT of the story. It did give a black man a slot, a chance if you will at getting ahead in life. Sounded fair to me.
LBJ certainly wasn't perfect.......but most people with thinking brains can see that this current occupant is a major Con man who only cares about the top % of people, and he will destroy our Country if he isn't booted out. There are actually some people in this country that can see through his exploitation, I just hope enough people do.

End of my comments.

LBJ, was a beer-swilling, blunt-speaking Texan, who didn’t shy from using what today we refer to as The N Word.
One sentence often attributed to LBJ, which has gained great fame on the internet, is this: "I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for 200 years."

ie Sustainable Votes.....................

This line is often trotted out to allege that the civil rights legislation LBJ pushed and ultimately signed was motivated not by altruism but a cynical ploy to lock up votes.

he had a lot of my good friends die because of his arrogance.

#Diversity SUXs, build the Wall & build the PipeLines
Mike I think you should keep up with the News of the day regarding the Top Tier of this Presidency. And by the way Where do You get your news since your comments are so well informed. >>>>> S-a-r-c-a-s-m
Let me say regarding truth, and fairness, and being a well informed impartial person.....I sure as heck wouldn't want you on a Jury. Call me a Racist all you want, like I told you before I don't let what others say Define me. Preach to your kids.
What you say helps to define you. I only know what I read.
What do you think of the Market hitting a new high the same day Pelosi delivers the articles.
How about today's housing market report?
What do you think of the healthcare change, to where the cost of the services must be posted.
This will promote competition!
MAGA
The affordable care act was anything but affordable.

Classified Ads

Event Calendar

<<

February 2025

>>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      
 

Upcoming Events

Twitter Feed